linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: support suspend/resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <DU0PR04MB941779A13906E00ACAC987AA88352@DU0PR04MB9417.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 01:26:01 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
	"Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
CC: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, Joerg
 Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Bixuan Cui
	<cuibixuan@...wei.com>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "iommu@...ts.linux.dev"
	<iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: support suspend/resume

> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: support suspend/resume
> 
> On Mon, Mar 25 2024 at 10:48, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 08:29:00PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> >> +static void arm_smmu_resume_unique_irqs(struct arm_smmu_device
> >> +*smmu) {
> >> +	struct device *dev = smmu->dev;
> >> +	struct msi_desc *desc;
> >> +	struct msi_msg msg;
> >> +
> >> +	if (!dev->msi.domain)
> >> +		return;
> >> +
> >> +	desc = irq_get_msi_desc(smmu->evtq.q.irq);
> >> +	if (desc) {
> >> +		get_cached_msi_msg(smmu->evtq.q.irq, &msg);
> >> +		arm_smmu_write_msi_msg(desc, &msg);
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	desc = irq_get_msi_desc(smmu->gerr_irq);
> >> +	if (desc) {
> >> +		get_cached_msi_msg(smmu->gerr_irq, &msg);
> >> +		arm_smmu_write_msi_msg(desc, &msg);
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_PRI) {
> >> +		desc = irq_get_msi_desc(smmu->priq.q.irq);
> >> +		if (desc) {
> >> +			get_cached_msi_msg(smmu->priq.q.irq, &msg);
> >> +			arm_smmu_write_msi_msg(desc, &msg);
> >> +		}
> >> +	}
> >> +}
> >
> > I wonder if this should be done instead by converting the driver away
> > from platform MSI to the new MSI mechanism?
> 
> There is work in progress for that. Should come around in the next weeks.

Then I need to wait for your patches, and rebase this patchset, or could
the non-msi part be reviewed first?

Thanks,
Peng.