linux-kernel - FAILED: Patch "vfio/pci: Lock external INTx masking ops" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240327122702.2841569-1-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 08:27:02 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: stable@...r.kernel.org,
	alex.williamson@...hat.com
Cc: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: FAILED: Patch "vfio/pci: Lock external INTx masking ops" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@...r.kernel.org>.

Thanks,
Sasha

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

>From 810cd4bb53456d0503cc4e7934e063835152c1b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 16:05:23 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] vfio/pci: Lock external INTx masking ops

Mask operations through config space changes to DisINTx may race INTx
configuration changes via ioctl.  Create wrappers that add locking for
paths outside of the core interrupt code.

In particular, irq_type is updated holding igate, therefore testing
is_intx() requires holding igate.  For example clearing DisINTx from
config space can otherwise race changes of the interrupt configuration.

This aligns interfaces which may trigger the INTx eventfd into two
camps, one side serialized by igate and the other only enabled while
INTx is configured.  A subsequent patch introduces synchronization for
the latter flows.

Cc:  <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Fixes: 89e1f7d4c66d ("vfio: Add PCI device driver")
Reported-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240308230557.805580-3-alex.williamson@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
index 136101179fcbd..75c85eec21b3c 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
@@ -99,13 +99,15 @@ static void vfio_send_intx_eventfd(void *opaque, void *unused)
 }
 
 /* Returns true if the INTx vfio_pci_irq_ctx.masked value is changed. */
-bool vfio_pci_intx_mask(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
+static bool __vfio_pci_intx_mask(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *pdev = vdev->pdev;
 	struct vfio_pci_irq_ctx *ctx;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	bool masked_changed = false;
 
+	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->igate);
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&vdev->irqlock, flags);
 
 	/*
@@ -143,6 +145,17 @@ bool vfio_pci_intx_mask(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
 	return masked_changed;
 }
 
+bool vfio_pci_intx_mask(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
+{
+	bool mask_changed;
+
+	mutex_lock(&vdev->igate);
+	mask_changed = __vfio_pci_intx_mask(vdev);
+	mutex_unlock(&vdev->igate);
+
+	return mask_changed;
+}
+
 /*
  * If this is triggered by an eventfd, we can't call eventfd_signal
  * or else we'll deadlock on the eventfd wait queue.  Return >0 when
@@ -194,12 +207,21 @@ static int vfio_pci_intx_unmask_handler(void *opaque, void *unused)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-void vfio_pci_intx_unmask(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
+static void __vfio_pci_intx_unmask(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
 {
+	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->igate);
+
 	if (vfio_pci_intx_unmask_handler(vdev, NULL) > 0)
 		vfio_send_intx_eventfd(vdev, NULL);
 }
 
+void vfio_pci_intx_unmask(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&vdev->igate);
+	__vfio_pci_intx_unmask(vdev);
+	mutex_unlock(&vdev->igate);
+}
+
 static irqreturn_t vfio_intx_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
 {
 	struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev = dev_id;
@@ -563,11 +585,11 @@ static int vfio_pci_set_intx_unmask(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_NONE) {
-		vfio_pci_intx_unmask(vdev);
+		__vfio_pci_intx_unmask(vdev);
 	} else if (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_BOOL) {
 		uint8_t unmask = *(uint8_t *)data;
 		if (unmask)
-			vfio_pci_intx_unmask(vdev);
+			__vfio_pci_intx_unmask(vdev);
 	} else if (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_EVENTFD) {
 		struct vfio_pci_irq_ctx *ctx = vfio_irq_ctx_get(vdev, 0);
 		int32_t fd = *(int32_t *)data;
@@ -594,11 +616,11 @@ static int vfio_pci_set_intx_mask(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_NONE) {
-		vfio_pci_intx_mask(vdev);
+		__vfio_pci_intx_mask(vdev);
 	} else if (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_BOOL) {
 		uint8_t mask = *(uint8_t *)data;
 		if (mask)
-			vfio_pci_intx_mask(vdev);
+			__vfio_pci_intx_mask(vdev);
 	} else if (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_EVENTFD) {
 		return -ENOTTY; /* XXX implement me */
 	}
-- 
2.43.0