[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZgOVNYkmXbXVCReV@xhacker>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 11:40:37 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
To: Charles Lohr <lohr85@...il.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, cleger@...osinc.com,
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, samuel.holland@...ive.com,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, ajones@...tanamicro.com,
dlemoal@...nel.org, Bjorn Topel <bjorn@...osinc.com>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: deprecate CONFIG_MMU=n
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 06:34:09PM -0700, Charles Lohr wrote:
> Sorry, if you don't mind clarifying, do you know which version you
> used, where you got it, and if you had to apply any patches?
Hi,
rv32 uclibc toolchain is based on gcc12.2, while rv64 uclibc is based on
gcc13.2
I built them with the mainline buildroot, and rv32 toolchain was built
a year ago, I forget whether there was patches applied. I may apply
patches from your mini-rv32ima repo. The rv64 toolchain was built a
month ago, no patch is applied.
Thanks
>
> Charles
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 6:28 PM Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 01:25:08PM -0700, Charles Lohr wrote:
> > > Jisheng, are you using musl or uclibc? I've been having difficulty
> > > getting new versions of each working with the newer kernels with
> > > system calls not lining up.
> >
> > Hi Charles,
> >
> > I tested nommu linux with uclibc, both rv32 and rv64
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists