linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mfd: rohm-bd71828: Add power off functionality

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240327140451.65ff8e18@aktux>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 14:04:51 +0100
From: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
Cc: lee@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
 conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mfd: rohm-bd71828: Add power off functionality

Hi,

On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 09:32:29 +0200
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com> wrote:

> It's worth noting that there is another PMIC, BD71879, which, from the 
> driver software point of view, should be (almost?) identical to the 
> BD71828. I believe the BD71828 drivers should work with it as well - if 
> not out of the box, at least with very minor modifications. 
> Unfortunately I don't know products where the BD71879 is used or if it 
> is sold via distributors - so I don't know if adding a DT 
> compatible/chip type define for it would be beneficial.

yes, you already told we thet the BD71828 drivers are compatible with
the BD71879 and I am using the latter. 
But that at least should be commented somewhere, so that
people do not raise questions, like: Do I have some strange board revision,
etc?
The most terse form to comment it is a separate dt compatible so we are
prepare any "almost identical" surprises.

Regards,
Andreas