lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 13:17:46 -0400
From: Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>
To: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>
Cc: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@....org>,  dev@...nvswitch.org,
  netdev@...r.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,  Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>,  Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,  Paolo Abeni
 <pabeni@...hat.com>,  "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH net] openvswitch: Set the skbuff pkt_type for
 proper pmtud support.

Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com> writes:

> On 25 Mar 2024, at 13:37, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
>> On 3/25/24 13:22, Aaron Conole wrote:
>>> Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 22 Mar 2024, at 20:06, Aaron Conole wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Open vSwitch is originally intended to switch at layer 2, only dealing with
>>>>> Ethernet frames.  With the introduction of l3 tunnels support, it crossed
>>>>> into the realm of needing to care a bit about some routing details when
>>>>> making forwarding decisions.  If an oversized packet would need to be
>>>>> fragmented during this forwarding decision, there is a chance for pmtu
>>>>> to get involved and generate a routing exception.  This is gated by the
>>>>> skbuff->pkt_type field.
>>>>>
>>>>> When a flow is already loaded into the openvswitch module this field is
>>>>> set up and transitioned properly as a packet moves from one port to
>>>>> another.  In the case that a packet execute is invoked after a flow is
>>>>> newly installed this field is not properly initialized.  This causes the
>>>>> pmtud mechanism to omit sending the required exception messages across
>>>>> the tunnel boundary and a second attempt needs to be made to make sure
>>>>> that the routing exception is properly setup.  To fix this, we set the
>>>>> outgoing packet's pkt_type to PACKET_OUTGOING, since it can only get
>>>>> to the openvswitch module via a port device or packet command.
>>>>
>>>> Is this not a problem when the packet comes from the bridge port in the kernel?
>>>
>>> It very well may be an issue there as well, but the recommendation is to
>>> operate with the bridge port down as far as I know, so I don't know if
>>> this issue has been observed happening from the bridge port.
>>
>> FWIW, bridge ports are typically used as an entry point for tunneled
>> traffic so it can egress from a physical port attached to OVS.  It means
>> they are pretty much always UP in most common setups like OpenStack or
>> ovn-kubernetes and handle a decent amount of traffic.  They are also used
>> to direct some other types of traffic to the host kernel.
>
> +1 here, I’m talking about the same port. I think we only advise
> having this down for userspace bridges, but not in the case the bridge
> is the tunnel endpoint.

Okay, I'll confirm about up/down, but it seems like it shouldn't matter
and we should be setting the outgoing type.

>> Unless I misunderstood which ports we're talking about here.
>>
>> Best regards, Ilya Maximets.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ