linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] selftests: iommu: add config needed for iommufd_fail

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f78b685d-a147-4b59-beb2-cde9d34ce22a@collabora.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 22:49:25 +0500
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
To: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
 Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>, kernel@...labora.com,
 iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
 Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: iommu: add config needed for iommufd_fail_nth

On 3/27/24 7:59 PM, Joao Martins wrote:
> On 27/03/2024 11:49, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 03:14:25PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>>> On 3/26/24 8:03 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 06:09:34PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>>>>> Even after applying this config patch and following snippet (which doesn't
>>>>> terminate the program if mmap doesn't allocate exactly as the hint), I'm
>>>>> finding failed tests.
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -1746,7 +1748,7 @@ FIXTURE_SETUP(iommufd_dirty_tracking)
>>>>>         assert((uintptr_t)self->buffer % HUGEPAGE_SIZE == 0);
>>>>>         vrc = mmap(self->buffer, variant->buffer_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
>>>>>                    mmap_flags, -1, 0);
>>>>> -       assert(vrc == self->buffer);
>>>>> +       assert(vrc == self->buffer);// ???
>>>>>
>>>>> On x86:
>>>>> # Totals: pass:176 fail:4 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>>>>> On ARM64:
>>>>> # Totals: pass:166 fail:14 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>>>>>
>>>>> The log files are attached.
>>>>
>>>> You probably don't have enough transparent huge pages available to the process
>>>>
>>>>       echo 1024 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
>>> After making huge pages available, the iommufd test always passed on x86.
>>> But there are still failures on arm64. I'm looking into the failures.
>>
>> Oh that is really strange. Joao? Nicolin?
>>
> Definitely strange, I'll have a look.
> 
> So it set the expected number of dirty bits as that assert doesn't fail, but it
> is failing when we check that even bits are set but not odd ones. Like it's
> hasn't set those bits.
> 
> For mock tests there should be no difference between x86 and ARM assuming the
> typical 4K page-size. Maybe this is 64k base pages in ARM? That's the only thing
> that I can think of that affected mock domain.
The config is attached. The defaults are being used i.e., 4k page.
> 
> Muhammad, could you paste your kconfig?
> 
>>> #  RUN           iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty128k.get_dirty_bitmap ...
>>> # iommufd_utils.h:374:get_dirty_bitmap:Expected j < npte (1) == test_bit(i + j, (unsigned long *)bitmap) (0)
>>> # get_dirty_bitmap: Test terminated by assertion
>>> #          FAIL  iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty128k.get_dirty_bitmap
>>> not ok 139 iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty128k.get_dirty_bitmap
>>
>>> #  RUN           iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty128k.get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear ...
>>> # iommufd_utils.h:374:get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear:Expected j < npte (1) == test_bit(i + j, (unsigned long *)bitmap) (0)
>>> # get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear: Test terminated by assertion
>>> #          FAIL  iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty128k.get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear
>>> not ok 140 iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty128k.get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear
>>
>>> #  RUN           iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty256k.get_dirty_bitmap ...
>>> # iommufd_utils.h:374:get_dirty_bitmap:Expected j < npte (1) == test_bit(i + j, (unsigned long *)bitmap) (0)
>>> # get_dirty_bitmap: Test terminated by assertion
>>> #          FAIL  iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty256k.get_dirty_bitmap
>>> not ok 144 iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty256k.get_dirty_bitmap
>>
>>> #  RUN           iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty256k.get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear ...
>>> # iommufd_utils.h:374:get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear:Expected j < npte (1) == test_bit(i + j, (unsigned long *)bitmap) (0)
>>> # get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear: Test terminated by assertion
>>> #          FAIL  iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty256k.get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear
>>> not ok 145 iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty256k.get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear
>>
>>> #  RUN           iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty640k.get_dirty_bitmap ...
>>> # iommufd_utils.h:374:get_dirty_bitmap:Expected j < npte (1) == test_bit(i + j, (unsigned long *)bitmap) (0)
>>> # get_dirty_bitmap: Test terminated by assertion
>>> #          FAIL  iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty640k.get_dirty_bitmap
>>> not ok 149 iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty640k.get_dirty_bitmap
>>
>>> #  RUN           iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty640k.get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear ...
>>> # iommufd_utils.h:374:get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear:Expected j < npte (1) == test_bit(i + j, (unsigned long *)bitmap) (0)
>>> # get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear: Test terminated by assertion
>>> #          FAIL  iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty640k.get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear
>>> not ok 150 iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty640k.get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear
>>
>>> #  RUN           iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty128M_huge.get_dirty_bitmap ...
>>> # iommufd_utils.h:374:get_dirty_bitmap:Expected j < npte (1) == test_bit(i + j, (unsigned long *)bitmap) (0)
>>> # get_dirty_bitmap: Test terminated by assertion
>>> #          FAIL  iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty128M_huge.get_dirty_bitmap
>>> not ok 159 iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty128M_huge.get_dirty_bitmap
>>
>>> #  RUN           iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty128M_huge.get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear ...
>>> # iommufd_utils.h:374:get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear:Expected j < npte (1) == test_bit(i + j, (unsigned long *)bitmap) (0)
>>> # get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear: Test terminated by assertion
>>> #          FAIL  iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty128M_huge.get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear
>>> not ok 160 iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty128M_huge.get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear
>>
>>> #  RUN           iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty256M.get_dirty_bitmap ...
>>> # iommufd_utils.h:374:get_dirty_bitmap:Expected j < npte (1) == test_bit(i + j, (unsigned long *)bitmap) (0)
>>> # get_dirty_bitmap: Test terminated by assertion
>>> #          FAIL  iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty256M.get_dirty_bitmap
>>> not ok 164 iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty256M.get_dirty_bitmap
>>
>>> #  RUN           iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty256M.get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear ...
>>> # iommufd_utils.h:374:get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear:Expected j < npte (1) == test_bit(i + j, (unsigned long *)bitmap) (0)
>>> # get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear: Test terminated by assertion
>>> #          FAIL  iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty256M.get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear
>>> not ok 165 iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty256M.get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear
>>
>>> #  RUN           iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty256M_huge.get_dirty_bitmap ...
>>> # iommufd_utils.h:374:get_dirty_bitmap:Expected j < npte (1) == test_bit(i + j, (unsigned long *)bitmap) (0)
>>> # get_dirty_bitmap: Test terminated by assertion
>>> #          FAIL  iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty256M_huge.get_dirty_bitmap
>>> not ok 169 iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty256M_huge.get_dirty_bitmap
>>
>>> #  RUN           iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty256M_huge.get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear ...
>>> # iommufd_utils.h:374:get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear:Expected j < npte (1) == test_bit(i + j, (unsigned long *)bitmap) (0)
>>> # get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear: Test terminated by assertion
>>> #          FAIL  iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty256M_huge.get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear
>>> not ok 170 iommufd_dirty_tracking.domain_dirty256M_huge.get_dirty_bitmap_no_clear
>>
> 

-- 
BR,
Muhammad Usama Anjum
View attachment "config-6.8.0-next-20240314-00001-gedd74cd6cdda-dirty" of type "text/plain" (294363 bytes)