[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a675f3f1-23cf-4b7c-ac93-437f57e9b48b@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 06:02:24 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@...il.com>
Cc: lars@...afoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, jic23@...nel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eraretuya@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] dt-bindings: iio: accel: adxl345: Add spi-3wire
On 26/03/2024 21:17, Lothar Rubusch wrote:
>>>
>>> V1: The first version of the 3wire patch. I have split the single
>>> patch upon some feedback (yours?!) - V2... So, my current
>>> interpretation is, that every feedback I need to mention as
>>> Reviewed-by tag, no?
>>
>> What? Feedback is not review. It's clearly explained in submitting
>> patches. Please read it.
>>
>
> Exactly. My missunderstanding here is this: Why did you send me a
> reminder that I forgot to add "Reviewed-by" tag in your last mail?
> Could you please clarify your last mail? You wrote:
> "(...)
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>
> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>
> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
> versions, (...)"
>
> AFAIK noone literally had told me: "please add a Reviewed-by me tag",
> or did I miss something? I'm a bit lost here, sorry.
>
What was this then:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/9700cc88-bddb-480d-9417-04b2ff539a2f@linaro.org/
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists