linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/19] amba: store owner from modules with amba_driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f23f2e60-e5c0-4c3c-9722-dba63a6e7ef6@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 06:57:30 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
 Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
 James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
 Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
 Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
 Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Andi Shyti
 <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Olivia Mackall <olivia@...enic.com>,
 Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
 Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
 Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
 Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>, Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
 Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-input@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] amba: store owner from modules with
 amba_driver_register()

On 27/03/2024 00:24, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof
> 
> On 26/03/2024 20:23, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Merging
>> =======
>> All further patches depend on the first amba patch, therefore please ack
>> and this should go via one tree.
> 
> Are you able to provide a stable branch with these patches once you pull

I doubt I will be merging this. I think amba code goes through Russell.

> them in to "one tree" here ? We have changes coming up in the coresight
> tree, which would conflict with the changes here (horribly).
> 

You mean conflict with  coresight conversion to platform driver? Worst
case it is solveable: just drop .owner.

Best regards,
Krzysztof