linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 07/13] pinctrl: renesas: pinctrl-rzg2l: Validate power registers for SD and ETH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 08:13:20 +0000
From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, 
	linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>, 
	Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/13] pinctrl: renesas: pinctrl-rzg2l: Validate power
 registers for SD and ETH

Hi Dan,

Thank you for the review.

On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 7:58 AM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aroorg> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 10:28:38PM +0000, Prabhakar wrote:
> > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> >
> > On RZ/V2H(P) SoC, the power registers for SD and ETH do not exist,
> > resulting in invalid register offsets. Ensure that the register offsets
> > are valid before any read/write operations are performed. If the power
>                                                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > registers are not available, both SD and ETH will be set to -EINVAL.
>   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Where does this happen?  It doesn't seem to be a part of this patchset.
> -EINVAL seems weird here, but it's hard to judge without actually seeing
> it.
>
Good catch, in patch 13/13 it should be below instead of sd_ch and
eth_poc assigned to 0.

+static const struct rzg2l_hwcfg rzv2h_hwcfg = {
+       .regs = {
+               .pwpr = 0x3c04,
+               .sd_ch = -EINVAL,
+               .eth_poc = -EINVAL,
+       },
+};

Cheers,
Prabhakar