[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56cc8b9e-c1cf-4520-ba45-b1237e8b7b64@collabora.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:14:25 +0500
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>, kernel@...labora.com,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: iommu: add config needed for iommufd_fail_nth
On 3/26/24 8:03 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 06:09:34PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>> Even after applying this config patch and following snippet (which doesn't
>> terminate the program if mmap doesn't allocate exactly as the hint), I'm
>> finding failed tests.
>>
>> @@ -1746,7 +1748,7 @@ FIXTURE_SETUP(iommufd_dirty_tracking)
>> assert((uintptr_t)self->buffer % HUGEPAGE_SIZE == 0);
>> vrc = mmap(self->buffer, variant->buffer_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
>> mmap_flags, -1, 0);
>> - assert(vrc == self->buffer);
>> + assert(vrc == self->buffer);// ???
>>
>> On x86:
>> # Totals: pass:176 fail:4 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>> On ARM64:
>> # Totals: pass:166 fail:14 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>>
>> The log files are attached.
>
> You probably don't have enough transparent huge pages available to the process
>
> echo 1024 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
After making huge pages available, the iommufd test always passed on x86.
But there are still failures on arm64. I'm looking into the failures.
cat /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
1024
/iommufd
..
# Totals: pass:166 fail:14 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>
> Jason
>
--
BR,
Muhammad Usama Anjum
View attachment "iommufd_arm.log" of type "text/x-log" (34970 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists