linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND v6 0/5] spmi: pmic-arb: Add support for multiple buses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 11:44:32 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Matthias Brugger
 <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
 Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
 Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Srini Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
 Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v6 0/5] spmi: pmic-arb: Add support for multiple
 buses

On 27/03/2024 11:37, Abel Vesa wrote:
> On 24-03-27 10:23:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 26/03/2024 17:28, Abel Vesa wrote:
>>> This RFC prepares for and adds support for 2 buses, which is supported
>>> in HW starting with version 7. Until now, none of the currently
>>> supported platforms in upstream have used the second bus. The X1E80100
>>> platform, on the other hand, needs the second bus for the USB2.0 to work
>>> as there are 3 SMB2360 PMICs which provide eUSB2 repeaters and they are
>>> all found on the second bus.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v6:
>>> - Changed the compatible to platform specific (X1E80100) along with the
>>>   schema. Fixed the spmi buses unit addresses and added the empty ranges
>>
>> Why resending after few days? And why without reviews?
>>
> 
> If you are referring to the initial v6 patchset, it was sent more than a
> month ago.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240222-spmi-multi-master-support-v6-0-bc34ea9561da@linaro.org/

Ykes, you are right.

Best regards,
Krzysztof