lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 11:29:07 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>, Christoffer Dall
 <cdall@...columbia.edu>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, Sean
 Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-riscv tree with the kvm-arm
 tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-riscv tree got a conflict in:

  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/arch_timer.c

between commit:

  29b0075ed61c ("KVM: selftests: Fix __GUEST_ASSERT() format warnings in ARM's arch timer test")

from the kvm-arm tree and commit:

  5448d9282af5 ("KVM: selftests: Fix spelling mistake "trigged" -> "triggered"")

from the kvm-riscv tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/arch_timer.c
index 93100b3f1312,16ac74d07d68..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/arch_timer.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/arch_timer.c
@@@ -135,8 -135,8 +135,8 @@@ static void guest_run_stage(struct test
  
  		irq_iter = READ_ONCE(shared_data->nr_iter);
  		__GUEST_ASSERT(config_iter + 1 == irq_iter,
 -				"config_iter + 1 = 0x%lx, irq_iter = 0x%lx.\n"
 +				"config_iter + 1 = 0x%x, irq_iter = 0x%x.\n"
- 				"  Guest timer interrupt was not trigged within the specified\n"
+ 				"  Guest timer interrupt was not triggered within the specified\n"
  				"  interval, try to increase the error margin by [-e] option.\n",
  				config_iter + 1, irq_iter);
  	}

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ