linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 02/14] mm: Switch mm->get_unmapped

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5b585bcced9b5fffbcfa093ea92a6403ee8ac462.camel@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 02:42:49 +0000
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
To: "keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>, "luto@...nel.org"
	<luto@...nel.org>, "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com"
	<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "debug@...osinc.com" <debug@...osinc.com>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Liam.Howlett@...cle.com" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
	"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "christophe.leroy@...roup.eu"
	<christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"jarkko@...nel.org" <jarkko@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, "sparclinux@...r.kernel.org"
	<sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "io-uring@...r.kernel.org"
	<io-uring@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, "nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev"
	<nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>, "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/14] mm: Switch mm->get_unmapped_area() to a flag

On Tue, 2024-03-26 at 13:57 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> In which conditions which path is used during the initialization of mm
> and why is this the case? It is an open claim in the current form.

There is an arch_pick_mmap_layout() that arch's can have their own rules for. There is also a
generic one. It gets called during exec.

> 
> That would be nice to have documented for the sake of being complete
> description. I have zero doubts of the claim being untrue.

...being untrue?