linux-kernel - FAILED: Patch "vfio/pci: Disable auto-enable of exclusive INTx IRQ" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240327122115.2836676-1-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 08:21:14 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: stable@...r.kernel.org,
	alex.williamson@...hat.com
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: FAILED: Patch "vfio/pci: Disable auto-enable of exclusive INTx IRQ" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@...r.kernel.org>.

Thanks,
Sasha

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

>From fe9a7082684eb059b925c535682e68c34d487d43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 16:05:22 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] vfio/pci: Disable auto-enable of exclusive INTx IRQ

Currently for devices requiring masking at the irqchip for INTx, ie.
devices without DisINTx support, the IRQ is enabled in request_irq()
and subsequently disabled as necessary to align with the masked status
flag.  This presents a window where the interrupt could fire between
these events, resulting in the IRQ incrementing the disable depth twice.
This would be unrecoverable for a user since the masked flag prevents
nested enables through vfio.

Instead, invert the logic using IRQF_NO_AUTOEN such that exclusive INTx
is never auto-enabled, then unmask as required.

Cc:  <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Fixes: 89e1f7d4c66d ("vfio: Add PCI device driver")
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240308230557.805580-2-alex.williamson@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
index 237beac838097..136101179fcbd 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
@@ -296,8 +296,15 @@ static int vfio_intx_set_signal(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, int fd)
 
 	ctx->trigger = trigger;
 
+	/*
+	 * Devices without DisINTx support require an exclusive interrupt,
+	 * IRQ masking is performed at the IRQ chip.  The masked status is
+	 * protected by vdev->irqlock. Setup the IRQ without auto-enable and
+	 * unmask as necessary below under lock.  DisINTx is unmodified by
+	 * the IRQ configuration and may therefore use auto-enable.
+	 */
 	if (!vdev->pci_2_3)
-		irqflags = 0;
+		irqflags = IRQF_NO_AUTOEN;
 
 	ret = request_irq(pdev->irq, vfio_intx_handler,
 			  irqflags, ctx->name, vdev);
@@ -308,13 +315,9 @@ static int vfio_intx_set_signal(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, int fd)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * INTx disable will stick across the new irq setup,
-	 * disable_irq won't.
-	 */
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&vdev->irqlock, flags);
-	if (!vdev->pci_2_3 && ctx->masked)
-		disable_irq_nosync(pdev->irq);
+	if (!vdev->pci_2_3 && !ctx->masked)
+		enable_irq(pdev->irq);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vdev->irqlock, flags);
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.43.0