lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ1PR11MB6083AADC97E50462C1137D71FC3B2@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 17:00:59 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 01/74] x86/cpu/vfm: Add/initialize x86_vfm field to struct
 cpuinfo_x86

> Looking at this more - you don't really need the vendor to be part of
> this as the CPUID leaf ranges should *actually* be disjunct. Actually...

It's essentially free to do this, and it makes the code more robust. It
becomes impossible to check model without also checking vendor
and family at the same time.

-Tony

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ