lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11f2e7d8-fd4c-4e14-81d8-cbc2cd2442fa@luigi311.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 11:55:24 -0600
From: Luigi311 <personal@...gi311.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, git@...gi311.com
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com,
 jacopo.mondi@...asonboard.com, mchehab@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
 krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, shawnguo@...nel.org,
 s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/23] media: i2c: imx258: Add support for 24MHz clock

On 3/28/24 02:09, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Luigi311,
> 
> Thank you for the patchset.
> 
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 05:16:54PM -0600, git@...gi311.com wrote:
>> From: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>
>>
>> There's no reason why only a clock of 19.2MHz is supported.
>> Indeed this isn't even a frequency listed in the datasheet.
>>
>> Add support for 24MHz as well.
>> The PLL settings result in slightly different link frequencies,
>> so parameterise those.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Luigi311 <git@...gi311.com>
> 
> Is Luigi311 your real name? As per
> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst, anonymous (or pseudonym I'd
> say as well) contributions are not an option.

Luigi311 is not my real name but it would be a lot easier to find me if
it was. My real name is Luis Garcia which is a super common name so its
actually way easier to find me and all my work using my online name of
Luigi311. I can go ahead and swap over to Luis Garcia if required but a
name like that would provide no value in contacting/finding me since I'm
not famous like all the other Luis Garcia's that appear on google.

> 
>> ---
>>  drivers/media/i2c/imx258.c | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>  1 file changed, 107 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx258.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx258.c
>> index 351add1bc5d5..6ee7de079454 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx258.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx258.c
>> @@ -76,9 +76,6 @@
>>  #define REG_CONFIG_MIRROR_FLIP		0x03
>>  #define REG_CONFIG_FLIP_TEST_PATTERN	0x02
>>  
>> -/* Input clock frequency in Hz */
>> -#define IMX258_INPUT_CLOCK_FREQ		19200000
>> -
>>  struct imx258_reg {
>>  	u16 address;
>>  	u8 val;
>> @@ -115,7 +112,9 @@ struct imx258_mode {
>>  };
>>  
>>  /* 4208x3120 needs 1267Mbps/lane, 4 lanes */
>> -static const struct imx258_reg mipi_data_rate_1267mbps[] = {
>> +static const struct imx258_reg mipi_1267mbps_19_2mhz[] = {
>> +	{ 0x0136, 0x13 },
>> +	{ 0x0137, 0x33 },
>>  	{ 0x0301, 0x05 },
>>  	{ 0x0303, 0x02 },
>>  	{ 0x0305, 0x03 },
>> @@ -133,7 +132,29 @@ static const struct imx258_reg mipi_data_rate_1267mbps[] = {
>>  	{ 0x0823, 0xCC },
>>  };
>>  
>> -static const struct imx258_reg mipi_data_rate_640mbps[] = {
>> +static const struct imx258_reg mipi_1272mbps_24mhz[] = {
>> +	{ 0x0136, 0x18 },
>> +	{ 0x0137, 0x00 },
>> +	{ 0x0301, 0x05 },
>> +	{ 0x0303, 0x02 },
>> +	{ 0x0305, 0x04 },
>> +	{ 0x0306, 0x00 },
>> +	{ 0x0307, 0xD4 },
>> +	{ 0x0309, 0x0A },
>> +	{ 0x030B, 0x01 },
>> +	{ 0x030D, 0x02 },
>> +	{ 0x030E, 0x00 },
>> +	{ 0x030F, 0xD8 },
>> +	{ 0x0310, 0x00 },
>> +	{ 0x0820, 0x13 },
>> +	{ 0x0821, 0x4C },
>> +	{ 0x0822, 0xCC },
>> +	{ 0x0823, 0xCC },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct imx258_reg mipi_640mbps_19_2mhz[] = {
>> +	{ 0x0136, 0x13 },
>> +	{ 0x0137, 0x33 },
>>  	{ 0x0301, 0x05 },
>>  	{ 0x0303, 0x02 },
>>  	{ 0x0305, 0x03 },
>> @@ -151,9 +172,27 @@ static const struct imx258_reg mipi_data_rate_640mbps[] = {
>>  	{ 0x0823, 0x00 },
>>  };
>>  
>> +static const struct imx258_reg mipi_642mbps_24mhz[] = {
>> +	{ 0x0136, 0x18 },
>> +	{ 0x0137, 0x00 },
>> +	{ 0x0301, 0x05 },
>> +	{ 0x0303, 0x02 },
>> +	{ 0x0305, 0x04 },
>> +	{ 0x0306, 0x00 },
>> +	{ 0x0307, 0x6B },
>> +	{ 0x0309, 0x0A },
>> +	{ 0x030B, 0x01 },
>> +	{ 0x030D, 0x02 },
>> +	{ 0x030E, 0x00 },
>> +	{ 0x030F, 0xD8 },
>> +	{ 0x0310, 0x00 },
>> +	{ 0x0820, 0x0A },
>> +	{ 0x0821, 0x00 },
>> +	{ 0x0822, 0x00 },
>> +	{ 0x0823, 0x00 },
>> +};
>> +
>>  static const struct imx258_reg mode_common_regs[] = {
>> -	{ 0x0136, 0x13 },
>> -	{ 0x0137, 0x33 },
>>  	{ 0x3051, 0x00 },
>>  	{ 0x3052, 0x00 },
>>  	{ 0x4E21, 0x14 },
>> @@ -313,10 +352,6 @@ static const char * const imx258_supply_name[] = {
>>  
>>  #define IMX258_NUM_SUPPLIES ARRAY_SIZE(imx258_supply_name)
>>  
>> -/* Configurations for supported link frequencies */
>> -#define IMX258_LINK_FREQ_634MHZ	633600000ULL
>> -#define IMX258_LINK_FREQ_320MHZ	320000000ULL
>> -
>>  enum {
>>  	IMX258_LINK_FREQ_1267MBPS,
>>  	IMX258_LINK_FREQ_640MBPS,
>> @@ -335,25 +370,55 @@ static u64 link_freq_to_pixel_rate(u64 f)
>>  }
>>  
>>  /* Menu items for LINK_FREQ V4L2 control */
>> -static const s64 link_freq_menu_items[] = {
>> +/* Configurations for supported link frequencies */
>> +#define IMX258_LINK_FREQ_634MHZ	633600000ULL
>> +#define IMX258_LINK_FREQ_320MHZ	320000000ULL
>> +
>> +static const s64 link_freq_menu_items_19_2[] = {
>>  	IMX258_LINK_FREQ_634MHZ,
>>  	IMX258_LINK_FREQ_320MHZ,
>>  };
>>  
>> +/* Configurations for supported link frequencies */
>> +#define IMX258_LINK_FREQ_636MHZ	636000000ULL
>> +#define IMX258_LINK_FREQ_321MHZ	321000000ULL
> 
> These values aren't used outside the array below and the macro names are
> imprecise anyway. Could you put the numerical values to the array instead?

Ok I've removed the defines and just threw the values into the array instead.

> 
>> +
>> +static const s64 link_freq_menu_items_24[] = {
>> +	IMX258_LINK_FREQ_636MHZ,
>> +	IMX258_LINK_FREQ_321MHZ,
>> +};
>> +
>>  /* Link frequency configs */
>> -static const struct imx258_link_freq_config link_freq_configs[] = {
>> +static const struct imx258_link_freq_config link_freq_configs_19_2[] = {
>>  	[IMX258_LINK_FREQ_1267MBPS] = {
>>  		.pixels_per_line = IMX258_PPL_DEFAULT,
>>  		.reg_list = {
>> -			.num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mipi_data_rate_1267mbps),
>> -			.regs = mipi_data_rate_1267mbps,
>> +			.num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mipi_1267mbps_19_2mhz),
>> +			.regs = mipi_1267mbps_19_2mhz,
>>  		}
>>  	},
>>  	[IMX258_LINK_FREQ_640MBPS] = {
>>  		.pixels_per_line = IMX258_PPL_DEFAULT,
>>  		.reg_list = {
>> -			.num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mipi_data_rate_640mbps),
>> -			.regs = mipi_data_rate_640mbps,
>> +			.num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mipi_640mbps_19_2mhz),
>> +			.regs = mipi_640mbps_19_2mhz,
>> +		}
>> +	},
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct imx258_link_freq_config link_freq_configs_24[] = {
>> +	[IMX258_LINK_FREQ_1267MBPS] = {
>> +		.pixels_per_line = IMX258_PPL_DEFAULT,
>> +		.reg_list = {
>> +			.num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mipi_1272mbps_24mhz),
>> +			.regs = mipi_1272mbps_24mhz,
>> +		}
>> +	},
>> +	[IMX258_LINK_FREQ_640MBPS] = {
>> +		.pixels_per_line = IMX258_PPL_DEFAULT,
>> +		.reg_list = {
>> +			.num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mipi_642mbps_24mhz),
>> +			.regs = mipi_642mbps_24mhz,
>>  		}
>>  	},
>>  };
>> @@ -410,6 +475,9 @@ struct imx258 {
>>  	/* Current mode */
>>  	const struct imx258_mode *cur_mode;
>>  
>> +	const struct imx258_link_freq_config *link_freq_configs;
>> +	const s64 *link_freq_menu_items;
>> +
>>  	/*
>>  	 * Mutex for serialized access:
>>  	 * Protect sensor module set pad format and start/stop streaming safely.
>> @@ -713,7 +781,7 @@ static int imx258_set_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
>>  		imx258->cur_mode = mode;
>>  		__v4l2_ctrl_s_ctrl(imx258->link_freq, mode->link_freq_index);
>>  
>> -		link_freq = link_freq_menu_items[mode->link_freq_index];
>> +		link_freq = imx258->link_freq_menu_items[mode->link_freq_index];
>>  		pixel_rate = link_freq_to_pixel_rate(link_freq);
>>  		__v4l2_ctrl_s_ctrl_int64(imx258->pixel_rate, pixel_rate);
>>  		/* Update limits and set FPS to default */
>> @@ -727,7 +795,7 @@ static int imx258_set_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
>>  			vblank_def);
>>  		__v4l2_ctrl_s_ctrl(imx258->vblank, vblank_def);
>>  		h_blank =
>> -			link_freq_configs[mode->link_freq_index].pixels_per_line
>> +			imx258->link_freq_configs[mode->link_freq_index].pixels_per_line
>>  			 - imx258->cur_mode->width;
>>  		__v4l2_ctrl_modify_range(imx258->hblank, h_blank,
>>  					 h_blank, 1, h_blank);
>> @@ -747,7 +815,7 @@ static int imx258_start_streaming(struct imx258 *imx258)
>>  
>>  	/* Setup PLL */
>>  	link_freq_index = imx258->cur_mode->link_freq_index;
>> -	reg_list = &link_freq_configs[link_freq_index].reg_list;
>> +	reg_list = &imx258->link_freq_configs[link_freq_index].reg_list;
>>  	ret = imx258_write_regs(imx258, reg_list->regs, reg_list->num_of_regs);
>>  	if (ret) {
>>  		dev_err(&client->dev, "%s failed to set plls\n", __func__);
>> @@ -946,9 +1014,9 @@ static int imx258_init_controls(struct imx258 *imx258)
>>  	imx258->link_freq = v4l2_ctrl_new_int_menu(ctrl_hdlr,
>>  				&imx258_ctrl_ops,
>>  				V4L2_CID_LINK_FREQ,
>> -				ARRAY_SIZE(link_freq_menu_items) - 1,
>> +				ARRAY_SIZE(link_freq_menu_items_19_2) - 1,
>>  				0,
>> -				link_freq_menu_items);
>> +				imx258->link_freq_menu_items);
>>  
>>  	if (imx258->link_freq)
>>  		imx258->link_freq->flags |= V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_READ_ONLY;
>> @@ -964,8 +1032,10 @@ static int imx258_init_controls(struct imx258 *imx258)
>>  	if (vflip)
>>  		vflip->flags |= V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_READ_ONLY;
>>  
>> -	pixel_rate_max = link_freq_to_pixel_rate(link_freq_menu_items[0]);
>> -	pixel_rate_min = link_freq_to_pixel_rate(link_freq_menu_items[1]);
>> +	pixel_rate_max =
>> +		link_freq_to_pixel_rate(imx258->link_freq_menu_items[0]);
>> +	pixel_rate_min =
>> +		link_freq_to_pixel_rate(imx258->link_freq_menu_items[1]);
> 
> The arrays currently have two entries so this works but it'd nice to have a
> bit more robust way to handle differences between the two arrays. Could you
> maintain e.g. the number of entries in the array in a struct field perhaps?

Would it make more sense to do something like default to index 0 and then use 
ARRAY_SIZE to iterate through the array and do a comparison to get the min and
max size so it would always choose the correct value no matter how many entries
there are?

> 
>>  	/* By default, PIXEL_RATE is read only */
>>  	imx258->pixel_rate = v4l2_ctrl_new_std(ctrl_hdlr, &imx258_ctrl_ops,
>>  				V4L2_CID_PIXEL_RATE,
>> @@ -1086,8 +1156,19 @@ static int imx258_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>>  	} else {
>>  		val = clk_get_rate(imx258->clk);
>>  	}
>> -	if (val != IMX258_INPUT_CLOCK_FREQ) {
>> -		dev_err(&client->dev, "input clock frequency not supported\n");
>> +
>> +	switch (val) {
>> +	case 19200000:
>> +		imx258->link_freq_configs = link_freq_configs_19_2;
>> +		imx258->link_freq_menu_items = link_freq_menu_items_19_2;
>> +		break;
>> +	case 24000000:
>> +		imx258->link_freq_configs = link_freq_configs_24;
>> +		imx258->link_freq_menu_items = link_freq_menu_items_24;
>> +		break;
>> +	default:
>> +		dev_err(&client->dev, "input clock frequency of %u not supported\n",
>> +			val);
>>  		return -EINVAL;
>>  	}
>>  
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ