linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 08/13] pinctrl: renesas: pinctrl-rzg2l: Add function pointers for writing to PFC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+V-a8u3C_-V=s64qj-EN+YB1Men37m-r1p7x8dmEvU+JXdMJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 19:45:33 +0000
From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, 
	linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>, 
	Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/13] pinctrl: renesas: pinctrl-rzg2l: Add function
 pointers for writing to PFC

Hi Claudiu,

Thank you for the review.

On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 8:13 AM claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 28.03.2024 10:02, claudiu beznea wrote:
> > Hi, Prabhakar,
> >
> > On 27.03.2024 00:28, Prabhakar wrote:
> >> From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> >>
> >> On the RZ/G2L SoC, the PFCWE bit controls writing to PFC registers.
> >> However, on the RZ/V2H(P) SoC, the PFCWE (REGWE_A on RZ/V2H) bit controls
> >> writing to both PFC and PMC registers. To accommodate these differences
> >> across SoC variants, introduce set_pfc_mode() and pm_set_pfc() function
> >> pointers.
> >
> > I think the overall code can be simplified if you add  1 function that does
> > the lock/unlock for PWPR. See patch 13.
>
> I meant to say one function for lock and one for unlock.
>
I agree, let me remodel it that way.

Cheers,
Prabhakar