[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6641b5c9-1685-3d90-ac15-0b2e9d546bc5@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:36:40 -0700
From: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
To: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<robdclark@...il.com>, <sean@...rly.run>, <swboyd@...omium.org>,
<dianders@...omium.org>, <vkoul@...nel.org>, <daniel@...ll.ch>,
<airlied@...il.com>, <agross@...nel.org>,
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
<andersson@...nel.org>
CC: <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>, <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com>,
<marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] phy/qcom-qmp-combo: propagate correct return value at
phy_power_on()
On 3/28/2024 2:07 PM, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
> Currently qmp_combo_dp_power_on() always return 0 in regardless of
> return value of cfg->configure_dp_phy(). This patch propagate
> return value of cfg->configure_dp_phy() all the way back to caller.
>
This is good. But I am also thinking if we should add some prints in
this driver like it doesnt even tell where it failed like here
ret = qmp_v456_configure_dp_phy(qmp);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
Also, I think we should have
Fixes: 94a407cc17a4 ("phy: qcom-qmp: create copies of QMP PHY driver")
If there is a better fixes tag for this, please let me know.
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c
> index 36632fa..884973a 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c
> @@ -2754,6 +2754,7 @@ static int qmp_combo_dp_power_on(struct phy *phy)
> const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg;
> void __iomem *tx = qmp->dp_tx;
> void __iomem *tx2 = qmp->dp_tx2;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> mutex_lock(&qmp->phy_mutex);
>
> @@ -2766,11 +2767,11 @@ static int qmp_combo_dp_power_on(struct phy *phy)
> cfg->configure_dp_tx(qmp);
>
> /* Configure link rate, swing, etc. */
> - cfg->configure_dp_phy(qmp);
> + ret = cfg->configure_dp_phy(qmp);
>
> mutex_unlock(&qmp->phy_mutex);
>
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int qmp_combo_dp_power_off(struct phy *phy)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists