[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b82ded95-d599-4ef7-b984-ac4d8a5c2370@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 19:58:54 -0700
From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
To: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>, hdegoede@...hat.com,
ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com
Cc: corbet@....net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] platform/x86: xiaomi-wmi: Fix race condition when
reporting key events
On 3/27/24 6:23 PM, Armin Wolf wrote:
> Multiple WMI events can be received concurrently, so multiple instances
> of xiaomi_wmi_notify() can be active at the same time. Since the input
> device is shared between those handlers, the key input sequence can be
> disturbed.
Since locking is needed for all notify related calls in all WMI drivers,
is there a generic way to add this support in WMI core driver? Like
defining some common function which will hold the lock and call
driver specific notify handler? I am just thinking aloud.. If it is not
feasible, then it is fine.
> Fix this by protecting the key input sequence with a mutex.
>
> Compile-tested only.
>
> Fixes: edb73f4f0247 ("platform/x86: wmi: add Xiaomi WMI key driver")
> Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/xiaomi-wmi.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/xiaomi-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/xiaomi-wmi.c
> index 1f5f108d87c0..7efbdc111803 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/xiaomi-wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/xiaomi-wmi.c
> @@ -2,8 +2,10 @@
> /* WMI driver for Xiaomi Laptops */
>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/input.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> #include <linux/wmi.h>
>
> #include <uapi/linux/input-event-codes.h>
> @@ -20,12 +22,21 @@
>
> struct xiaomi_wmi {
> struct input_dev *input_dev;
> + struct mutex key_lock; /* Protects the key event sequence */
> unsigned int key_code;
> };
>
> +static void xiaomi_mutex_destroy(void *data)
> +{
> + struct mutex *lock = data;
> +
> + mutex_destroy(lock);
> +}
> +
> static int xiaomi_wmi_probe(struct wmi_device *wdev, const void *context)
> {
> struct xiaomi_wmi *data;
> + int ret;
>
> if (wdev == NULL || context == NULL)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -35,6 +46,11 @@ static int xiaomi_wmi_probe(struct wmi_device *wdev, const void *context)
> return -ENOMEM;
> dev_set_drvdata(&wdev->dev, data);
>
> + mutex_init(&data->key_lock);
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&wdev->dev, xiaomi_mutex_destroy, &data->key_lock);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> data->input_dev = devm_input_allocate_device(&wdev->dev);
> if (data->input_dev == NULL)
> return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -59,10 +75,12 @@ static void xiaomi_wmi_notify(struct wmi_device *wdev, union acpi_object *dummy)
> if (data == NULL)
> return;
>
> + mutex_lock(&data->key_lock);
> input_report_key(data->input_dev, data->key_code, 1);
> input_sync(data->input_dev);
> input_report_key(data->input_dev, data->key_code, 0);
> input_sync(data->input_dev);
> + mutex_unlock(&data->key_lock);
> }
>
> static const struct wmi_device_id xiaomi_wmi_id_table[] = {
> --
> 2.39.2
>
>
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists