lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1a7f1818-2f2c-4e89-b2dd-4ad0f72ae3c2@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:49:17 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
 Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, peter.griffin@...aro.org,
 robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 andre.draszik@...aro.org, willmcvicker@...gle.com, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: exynos: gs101: join lines close to 80
 chars

On 26/03/2024 15:48, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> 
> 
> On 3/26/24 11:10, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>> Hi Tudor
> 
> Hi, Alim!
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2024 4:06 PM
>>> To: peter.griffin@...aro.org; robh+dt@...nel.org;
>>> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org; conor+dt@...nel.org
>>> Cc: alim.akhtar@...sung.com; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-
>>> samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-
>>> kernel@...r.kernel.org; andre.draszik@...aro.org;
>>> willmcvicker@...gle.com; kernel-team@...roid.com; Tudor Ambarus
>>> <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
>>> Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: exynos: gs101: join lines close to 80
>> chars
>>>
>>> These lines fit 81 characters, which is pretty close to 80.
>>> Join the lines.
>>>
>> Does this breaks checkpatch flow?
> 
> ./scripts/checkpatch --strict does not complain

Because checkpatch does not have limit of 80... Coding style has, but
for readability it is fine to stretch or even break this rule.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ