linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: exynos: gs101: join lines close to 80 chars

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:49:17 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
 Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, peter.griffin@...aro.org,
 robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 andre.draszik@...aro.org, willmcvicker@...gle.com, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: exynos: gs101: join lines close to 80
 chars

On 26/03/2024 15:48, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> 
> 
> On 3/26/24 11:10, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>> Hi Tudor
> 
> Hi, Alim!
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2024 4:06 PM
>>> To: peter.griffin@...aro.org; robh+dt@...nel.org;
>>> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org; conor+dt@...nel.org
>>> Cc: alim.akhtar@...sung.com; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-
>>> samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-
>>> kernel@...r.kernel.org; andre.draszik@...aro.org;
>>> willmcvicker@...gle.com; kernel-team@...roid.com; Tudor Ambarus
>>> <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
>>> Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: exynos: gs101: join lines close to 80
>> chars
>>>
>>> These lines fit 81 characters, which is pretty close to 80.
>>> Join the lines.
>>>
>> Does this breaks checkpatch flow?
> 
> ./scripts/checkpatch --strict does not complain

Because checkpatch does not have limit of 80... Coding style has, but
for readability it is fine to stretch or even break this rule.

Best regards,
Krzysztof