[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240328111907.cknfqe3qpiyeipsp@dhruva>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:49:07 +0530
From: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC: <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <nm@...com>, <vigneshr@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] bus: ti-sysc: Add a description and copyrights
On Mar 27, 2024 at 10:15:05 +0200, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> The ti-sysc driver is missing coprights and description, let's add
> those.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
> ---
> drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c b/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
> --- a/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,17 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> /*
> * ti-sysc.c - Texas Instruments sysc interconnect target driver
> + *
> + * TI SoCs have an interconnect target wrapper IP for many devices. The wrapper
> + * IP manages clock gating, resets, and PM capabilities for the connected devices.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2017-2024 Texas Instruments Incorporated - https://www.ti.com/
> + *
> + * Many features are based on the earlier omap_hwmod arch code with thanks to all
> + * the people who developed and debugged the code over the years:
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2009-2011 Nokia Corporation
> + * Copyright (C) 2011-2012 Texas Instruments, Inc.
+Nishant
I am no expert on the copyrights part of it, but who gets copyright from
2012 - 2017?
Also, for TI should we stick to this format as you did above?
Copyright (C) 2011-2024 Texas Instruments Incorporated
perhaps?
But otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
--
Best regards,
Dhruva
Powered by blists - more mailing lists