[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f6bb6f62-c114-4a82-bbaf-9994da8999cd@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:51:17 +0100
From: Jeremi Piotrowski <jpiotrowski@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@....com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86/CPU/AMD: Track SNP host status with
cc_platform_*()
On 27/03/2024 16:43, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: "Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@...en8.de>
>
> The host SNP worthiness can determined later, after alternatives have
> been patched, in snp_rmptable_init() depending on cmdline options like
> iommu=pt which is incompatible with SNP, for example.
>
> Which means that one cannot use X86_FEATURE_SEV_SNP and will need to
> have a special flag for that control.
>
> Use that newly added CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP in the appropriate places.
>
> Move kdump_sev_callback() to its rightfull place, while at it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@...en8.de>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h | 4 ++--
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++------------
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/generic.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/sev.c | 10 --------
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------
> drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c | 2 +-
> drivers/iommu/amd/init.c | 4 +++-
> 8 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h
> index 9477b4053bce..780182cda3ab 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h
> @@ -228,7 +228,6 @@ int snp_issue_guest_request(u64 exit_code, struct snp_req_data *input, struct sn
> void snp_accept_memory(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end);
> u64 snp_get_unsupported_features(u64 status);
> u64 sev_get_status(void);
> -void kdump_sev_callback(void);
> void sev_show_status(void);
> #else
> static inline void sev_es_ist_enter(struct pt_regs *regs) { }
> @@ -258,7 +257,6 @@ static inline int snp_issue_guest_request(u64 exit_code, struct snp_req_data *in
> static inline void snp_accept_memory(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end) { }
> static inline u64 snp_get_unsupported_features(u64 status) { return 0; }
> static inline u64 sev_get_status(void) { return 0; }
> -static inline void kdump_sev_callback(void) { }
> static inline void sev_show_status(void) { }
> #endif
>
> @@ -270,6 +268,7 @@ int psmash(u64 pfn);
> int rmp_make_private(u64 pfn, u64 gpa, enum pg_level level, u32 asid, bool immutable);
> int rmp_make_shared(u64 pfn, enum pg_level level);
> void snp_leak_pages(u64 pfn, unsigned int npages);
> +void kdump_sev_callback(void);
> #else
> static inline bool snp_probe_rmptable_info(void) { return false; }
> static inline int snp_lookup_rmpentry(u64 pfn, bool *assigned, int *level) { return -ENODEV; }
> @@ -282,6 +281,7 @@ static inline int rmp_make_private(u64 pfn, u64 gpa, enum pg_level level, u32 as
> }
> static inline int rmp_make_shared(u64 pfn, enum pg_level level) { return -ENODEV; }
> static inline void snp_leak_pages(u64 pfn, unsigned int npages) {}
> +static inline void kdump_sev_callback(void) { }
> #endif
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> index 6d8677e80ddb..9bf17c9c29da 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> @@ -345,6 +345,28 @@ static void srat_detect_node(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> #endif
> }
>
> +static void bsp_determine_snp(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CC_PLATFORM
> + cc_vendor = CC_VENDOR_AMD;
Shouldn't this line be inside the cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_SEV_SNP) check?
> +
> + if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_SEV_SNP)) {
> + /*
> + * RMP table entry format is not architectural and is defined by the
> + * per-processor PPR. Restrict SNP support on the known CPU models
> + * for which the RMP table entry format is currently defined for.
> + */> + if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR) &&
How about turning this into a more specific check:
if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_SEV_SNP) &&
Thanks,
Jeremi
> + c->x86 >= 0x19 && snp_probe_rmptable_info()) {
> + cc_platform_set(CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP);
> + } else {
> + setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SEV_SNP);
> + cc_platform_clear(CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP);
> + }
> + }
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> static void bsp_init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> {
> if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC)) {
> @@ -452,21 +474,7 @@ static void bsp_init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> break;
> }
>
> - if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_SEV_SNP)) {
> - /*
> - * RMP table entry format is not architectural and it can vary by processor
> - * and is defined by the per-processor PPR. Restrict SNP support on the
> - * known CPU model and family for which the RMP table entry format is
> - * currently defined for.
> - */
> - if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ZEN3) &&
> - !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ZEN4) &&
> - !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ZEN5))
> - setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SEV_SNP);
> - else if (!snp_probe_rmptable_info())
> - setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SEV_SNP);
> - }
> -
> + bsp_determine_snp(c);
> return;
>
> warn:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists