linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v6 11/17] dt-bindings: net: pse-pd: Add another way of describing several PSE PIs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 13:31:06 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
	Russ Weight <russ.weight@...ux.dev>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Dent Project <dentproject@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 11/17] dt-bindings: net: pse-pd: Add another
 way of describing several PSE PIs

> +          pairsets:
> +            $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> +            description:
> +              List of phandles, each pointing to the power supply for the
> +              corresponding pairset named in 'pairset-names'. This property
> +              aligns with IEEE 802.3-2022, Section 33.2.3 and 145.2.4.
> +              PSE Pinout Alternatives (as per IEEE 802.3-2022 Table 145\u20133)
> +              |-----------|---------------|---------------|---------------|---------------|
> +              | Conductor | Alternative A | Alternative A | Alternative B | Alternative B |
> +              |           |    (MDI-X)    |     (MDI)     |      (X)      |      (S)      |
> +              |-----------|---------------|---------------|---------------|---------------|
> +              | 1         | Negative VPSE | Positive VPSE | \u2014             | \u2014             |
> +              | 2         | Negative VPSE | Positive VPSE | \u2014             | \u2014             |
> +              | 3         | Positive VPSE | Negative VPSE | \u2014             | \u2014             |
> +              | 4         | \u2014             | \u2014             | Negative VPSE | Positive VPSE |
> +              | 5         | \u2014             | \u2014             | Negative VPSE | Positive VPSE |
> +              | 6         | Positive VPSE | Negative VPSE | \u2014             | \u2014             |
> +              | 7         | \u2014             | \u2014             | Positive VPSE | Negative VPSE |
> +              | 8         | \u2014             | \u2014             | Positive VPSE | Negative VPSE |

Is it possible to avoid \u encoding? Ideally this documentation should
be understandable without having to render it using a toolset. I just
want to use less(1).

Or is this a email problem? Has something converted your UTF-8 file to
this \u notation?

     Andrew