linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/147] 4.19.311-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYuNsVNtWr9mLvgPnjRPr0Eq45eH9cSdEc6tbbDpXzFrNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 19:37:42 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, 
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, 
	shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, 
	florian.fainelli@...adcom.com, pavel@...x.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/147] 4.19.311-rc2 review

On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 18:07, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 17:29, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.311 release.
> > There are 147 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed Mar 27 11:58:33 AM UTC 2024.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/patch/?id=linux-4.19.y&id2=v4.19.310
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sasha
>
> One more important update from Linaro LKFT testing,
>
> LTP syscalls fallocate06 fails on qemu-arm64 and juno-r2 devices.
>
> fallocate06.c:155: TFAIL: fallocate(FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE |
> FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE) failed unexpectedly: ENOSPC (28)
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>
> We are running bisections on this issue and get back to you.

This is to confirm that the reported issue is not a kernel regression.
The reason is due to updates on userspace tools regarding the btrfs.

- Naresh