linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/9] dm integrity: fix out-of-range warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240328143051.1069575-2-arnd@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:30:39 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...nel.org>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
	dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
	llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] dm integrity: fix out-of-range warning

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

Depending on the value of CONFIG_HZ, clang compares about a pointless
comparison:

drivers/md/dm-integrity.c:4085:12: error: result of comparison of constant 42949672950 with expression of type 'unsigned int' is always false [-Werror,-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
                        if (val >= (uint64_t)UINT_MAX * 1000 / HZ) {

As the check remains useful for other configurations, shut up the
warning by adding a second type cast to uint64_t.

Fixes: 468dfca38b1a ("dm integrity: add a bitmap mode")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
 drivers/md/dm-integrity.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c b/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
index 37b9f8f1ae1a..7f3dc8ee6ab8 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
@@ -4221,7 +4221,7 @@ static int dm_integrity_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned int argc, char **argv
 		} else if (sscanf(opt_string, "sectors_per_bit:%llu%c", &llval, &dummy) == 1) {
 			log2_sectors_per_bitmap_bit = !llval ? 0 : __ilog2_u64(llval);
 		} else if (sscanf(opt_string, "bitmap_flush_interval:%u%c", &val, &dummy) == 1) {
-			if (val >= (uint64_t)UINT_MAX * 1000 / HZ) {
+			if ((uint64_t)val >= (uint64_t)UINT_MAX * 1000 / HZ) {
 				r = -EINVAL;
 				ti->error = "Invalid bitmap_flush_interval argument";
 				goto bad;
-- 
2.39.2