[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240329170038.3863998-8-eahariha@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 17:00:31 +0000
From: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@...ux.microsoft.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org (open list:MEDIA INPUT INFRASTRUCTURE (V4L/DVB)),
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org (open list:RADEON and AMDGPU DRM DRIVERS),
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org (open list:DRM DRIVERS),
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list),
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org (open list:INTEL DRM DISPLAY FOR XE AND I915 DRIVERS),
intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org (open list:INTEL DRM DISPLAY FOR XE AND I915 DRIVERS),
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org (open list:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS),
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org (open list:I2C SUBSYSTEM HOST DRIVERS),
linux-media@...r.kernel.org (open list:BTTV VIDEO4LINUX DRIVER),
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org (open list:FRAMEBUFFER LAYER)
Subject: [PATCH v0 07/14] media: cx25821: Make I2C terminology more inclusive
I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave"
with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of
I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that the approved verbiage exists
in the specification.
Compile tested, no functionality changes intended
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240322132619.6389-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com/
Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@...ux.microsoft.com>
---
drivers/media/pci/cx25821/cx25821-i2c.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/cx25821/cx25821-i2c.c b/drivers/media/pci/cx25821/cx25821-i2c.c
index 0ef4cd6528a0..bad8fb9f5319 100644
--- a/drivers/media/pci/cx25821/cx25821-i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/media/pci/cx25821/cx25821-i2c.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ do { \
#define I2C_EXTEND (1 << 3)
#define I2C_NOSTOP (1 << 4)
-static inline int i2c_slave_did_ack(struct i2c_adapter *i2c_adap)
+static inline int i2c_client_did_ack(struct i2c_adapter *i2c_adap)
{
struct cx25821_i2c *bus = i2c_adap->algo_data;
struct cx25821_dev *dev = bus->dev;
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int i2c_sendbytes(struct i2c_adapter *i2c_adap,
if (!i2c_wait_done(i2c_adap))
return -EIO;
- if (!i2c_slave_did_ack(i2c_adap))
+ if (!i2c_client_did_ack(i2c_adap))
return -EIO;
dprintk(1, "%s(): returns 0\n", __func__);
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static int i2c_readbytes(struct i2c_adapter *i2c_adap,
cx_write(bus->reg_ctrl, bus->i2c_period | (1 << 2) | 1);
if (!i2c_wait_done(i2c_adap))
return -EIO;
- if (!i2c_slave_did_ack(i2c_adap))
+ if (!i2c_client_did_ack(i2c_adap))
return -EIO;
dprintk(1, "%s(): returns 0\n", __func__);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists