[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zgb6LQndjoFVu4pv@memverge.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 13:28:13 -0400
From: Gregory Price <gregory.price@...verge.com>
To: Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@...gle.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>,
Henry Huang <henry.hj@...group.com>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Sudarshan Rajagopalan <quic_sudaraja@...cinc.com>,
Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Vasily Averin <vasily.averin@...ux.dev>,
Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>, Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>,
Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>,
"Vishal Moola (Oracle)" <vishal.moola@...il.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/8] mm: workingset reporting
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 03:53:39PM -0700, Yuanchu Xie wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 2:44 PM Gregory Price
> <gregory.price@...verge.com> wrote:
> >
> > Please note that this proposed interface (move_phys_pages) is very
> > unlikely to be received upstream due to side channel concerns. Instead,
> > it's more likely that the tiering component will expose a "promote X
> > pages from tier A to tier B", and the kernel component would then
> > use/consume hotness information to determine which pages to promote.
>
> I see that mm/memory-tiers.c only has support for demotion. What kind
> of hotness information do devices typically provide? The OCP proposal
> is not very specific about this.
> A list of hot pages with configurable threshold?
> Access frequency for all pages at configured granularity?
> Is there a way to tell which NUMA node is accessing them, for page promotion?
(caveat: i'm not a memory-tiers maintainer, you may want to poke at them
directly for more information, this is simply spitballing an idea)
I don't know of any public proposals of explicit hotness information
provided by hardware yet, just the general proposal.
For the sake of simplicity, I would make the assumption that you have
the least information possible - a simple list of "hot addresses" in
Host Physcal Address format.
I.e. there's some driver function that amounts to:
uint32_t device_get_hot_addresses(uint64_t *addresses, uint32_t buf_max);
Where the return value is number of addresses the device returned, and
the buf_max is the number of addresses that can be read.
Drives providing this functionality would then register this as a
callback when its memory becomes a member of some numa node.
Re: source node -
Devices have no real way of determining upstream source information.
> >
> > (Just as one example, there are many more realistic designs)
> >
> > So if there is a way to expose workingset data to the mm/memory_tiers.c
> > component instead of via sysfs/cgroup - that is preferable.
>
> Appreciate the feedback. The data in its current form might be useful
> to inform demotion decisions, but for promotion, are you aware of any
> recent developments? I would like to encode hotness as workingset data
> as well.
There were some recent patches to DAMON about promotion/demotion. You
might look there.
~Gregory
Powered by blists - more mailing lists