linux-kernel - Re: FAILED: Patch "x86/sev: Fix position dependent variable references in startup code" failed to apply to 6.8-stable tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024032942-implant-pyramid-e3cf@gregkh>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 18:56:03 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Kevin Loughlin <kevinloughlin@...gle.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, stable@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FAILED: Patch "x86/sev: Fix position dependent variable
 references in startup code" failed to apply to 6.8-stable tree

On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 05:25:35PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 at 13:56, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 04:39:20PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 at 14:08, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The patch below does not apply to the 6.8-stable tree.
> > > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> > > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> > > > id to <stable@...r.kernel.org>.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I will send the v6.8 backport separately right away.
> > >
> > > v6.7 and v6.6 can take this patch unmodified but will need to take
> > > 29956748339aa8757a7e2f927a8679dd08f24bb6 as a prerequisite first.
> >
> > Now done, thanks.
> >
> > > (v6.8 no longer applies because of the way Linus fixed up a merge
> > > conflict in the 6.8 cycle)
> >
> > I fixed this up by hand, hopefully got it right :)
> >
> 
> Thanks - I will double check once the patches are sent out.
> 
> > > v6.1 and older need separate backports so i will send those out later.
> >
> > Wonderful, thanks!
> >
> 
> I sent this out on Wednesday but I don't see them in lore. Please let
> me know if I should resend these.
> 
> [PATCH -stable-6.1 1/4] x86/coco: Export cc_vendor
> [PATCH -stable-6.1 2/4] x86/coco: Get rid of accessor functions
> [PATCH -stable-6.1 3/4] x86/Kconfig: Remove
> CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT_ACTIVE_BY_DEFAULT
> [PATCH -stable-6.1 4/4] x86/sev: Fix position dependent variable
> references in startup code

I can't see those anywhere, so yes, please resend as they are not in my
queue, or archive, at all.

thanks,

greg k-h