[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZgcSIb4BVcbVmPyW@surfacebook.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 21:10:25 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
Oleksii Moisieiev <oleksii_moisieiev@...m.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] pinctrl: Implementation of the generic
scmi-pinctrl driver
Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 08:15:17PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) kirjoitti:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>
> scmi-pinctrl driver implements pinctrl driver interface and using
> SCMI protocol to redirect messages from pinctrl subsystem SDK to
> SCMI platform firmware, which does the changes in HW.
..
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/seq_file.h>
> +#include <linux/scmi_protocol.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
Use IWYU principle. There are missing header inclusions and/or forward
declarations.
..
> +struct scmi_pinctrl_funcs {
> + unsigned int num_groups;
> + const char **groups;
> +};
This is repeating struct pinfunction. Why can't the latter be used?
..
> +err_free:
> + devm_kfree(pmx->dev, groups);
Why?!
This is 99.9% that the initial allocation must not be devm.
..
> + *p_config_value = kcalloc(num_configs, sizeof(u32), GFP_KERNEL);
sizeof(**p_config_value)?
> + *p_config_type = kcalloc(num_configs,
> + sizeof(enum scmi_pinctrl_conf_type),
sizeof(**p_config_type)?
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> + if (!*p_config_value || !*p_config_type) {
> + kfree(*p_config_value);
> + kfree(*p_config_type);
> + return -ENOMEM;
Why to allocate / free memory in the case when you know that the first one
failed?
> + }
..
> +static int pinctrl_scmi_get_pins(struct scmi_pinctrl *pmx,
> + struct pinctrl_desc *desc)
> +{
> + struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pins;
> + unsigned int npins;
> + int ret, i;
> +
> + npins = pinctrl_ops->count_get(pmx->ph, PIN_TYPE);
> + pins = devm_kmalloc_array(pmx->dev, npins, sizeof(*pins), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pins)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < npins; i++) {
> + pins[i].number = i;
> + ret = pinctrl_ops->name_get(pmx->ph, i, PIN_TYPE, &pins[i].name);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(pmx->dev, ret,
> + "Can't get name for pin %d", i);
> + }
> +
> + desc->npins = npins;
> + desc->pins = pins;
> + dev_dbg(pmx->dev, "got pins %d", npins);
%u
> + return 0;
> +}
..
> + pinctrl_ops = handle->devm_protocol_get(sdev, SCMI_PROTOCOL_PINCTRL,
> + &ph);
One line.
> + if (IS_ERR(pinctrl_ops))
> + return PTR_ERR(pinctrl_ops);
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists