[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1fe6813db395563be658a9b557931cf4db949100.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 15:27:58 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com>, dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com,
eric.snowberg@...cle.com, jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, pc@...guebit.com,
christian@...uner.io, Roberto
Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Sasha Levin
<sashal@...nel.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ima: evm: Rename *_post_path_mknod() to
*_path_post_mknod()
[Cc: Sasha, Greg]
On Fri, 2024-03-29 at 15:12 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> I'd take it one step further and remove both 'Fixes' tags. A 'Fixes'
> tag implies a flaw in the functionality of the code, this is just a
> function rename.
Totally agree.
> Another important thing to keep in mind about 'Fixes' tags, unless
> you've told the stable kernel folks to only take patches that you've
> explicitly marked for stable, they are likely going to attempt to
> backport anything with a 'Fixes' tag.
How do we go about doing that? Do we just send an email to stable?
Is it disabled for security? I thought new functionality won't be backported.
Hopefully the changes for making IMA & EVM full fledged LSMs won't be
automatically backported to stable.
thanks,
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists