linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 02/11] scsi: ufs: qcom: Perform read back after writing REG_UFS_SYS1CLK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240329-ufs-reset-ensure-effect-before-delay-v5-2-181252004586@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 15:46:44 -0500
From: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
To: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
	Janek Kotas <jank@...ence.com>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
	Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
	Can Guo <quic_cang@...cinc.com>,
	Anjana Hari <quic_ahari@...cinc.com>
Cc: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 02/11] scsi: ufs: qcom: Perform read back after writing
 REG_UFS_SYS1CLK_1US

Currently after writing to REG_UFS_SYS1CLK_1US a mb() is used to ensure
that write has gone through to the device.

mb() ensure that the write completes, but completion doesn't mean that
it isn't stored in a buffer somewhere. The recommendation for
ensuring this bit has taken effect on the device is to perform a read
back to force it to make it all the way to the device. This is
documented in device-io.rst and a talk by Will Deacon on this can
be seen over here:

    https://youtu.be/i6DayghhA8Q?si=MiyxB5cKJXSaoc01&t=1678

Let's do that to ensure the bit hits the device. Because the mb()'s
purpose wasn't to add extra ordering (on top of the ordering guaranteed
by writel()/readl()), it can safely be removed.

Fixes: f06fcc7155dc ("scsi: ufs-qcom: add QUniPro hardware support and power optimizations")
Reviewed-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@...cinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
---
 drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
index 06859e17b67b..804dc8153e7b 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
@@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ static int ufs_qcom_cfg_timers(struct ufs_hba *hba, u32 gear,
 		 * make sure above write gets applied before we return from
 		 * this function.
 		 */
-		mb();
+		ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UFS_SYS1CLK_1US);
 	}
 
 	return 0;

-- 
2.44.0