linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 08/11] scsi: ufs: core: Perform read back after disabling interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240329-ufs-reset-ensure-effect-before-delay-v5-8-181252004586@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 15:46:50 -0500
From: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
To: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
	Janek Kotas <jank@...ence.com>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
	Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
	Can Guo <quic_cang@...cinc.com>,
	Anjana Hari <quic_ahari@...cinc.com>
Cc: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 08/11] scsi: ufs: core: Perform read back after
 disabling interrupts

Currently, interrupts are cleared and disabled prior to registering the
interrupt. An mb() is used to complete the clear/disable writes before
the interrupt is registered.

mb() ensure that the write completes, but completion doesn't mean that
it isn't stored in a buffer somewhere. The recommendation for
ensuring these bits have taken effect on the device is to perform a read
back to force it to make it all the way to the device. This is
documented in device-io.rst and a talk by Will Deacon on this can
be seen over here:

    https://youtu.be/i6DayghhA8Q?si=MiyxB5cKJXSaoc01&t=1678

Let's do that to ensure these bits hit the device. Because the mb()'s
purpose wasn't to add extra ordering (on top of the ordering guaranteed
by writel()/readl()), it can safely be removed.

Fixes: 199ef13cac7d ("scsi: ufs: avoid spurious UFS host controller interrupts")
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Reviewed-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@...cinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
---
 drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
index a89887878d98..268fcfebd7bd 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
@@ -10616,7 +10616,7 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq)
 	 * Make sure that UFS interrupts are disabled and any pending interrupt
 	 * status is cleared before registering UFS interrupt handler.
 	 */
-	mb();
+	ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_INTERRUPT_ENABLE);
 
 	/* IRQ registration */
 	err = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, ufshcd_intr, IRQF_SHARED, UFSHCD, hba);

-- 
2.44.0