linux-kernel - Re: Add clk-fixes branch to pending-fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240330095732.644ba298@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 09:57:32 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
 <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: Add clk-fixes branch to pending-fixes

Hi Stephen,

On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 18:06:43 -0700 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Can you add the clk-fixes branch to linux-next's pending-fixes branch?
> Krzysztof mentioned that it wasn't in there and some CI uses that. The
> clk-fixes branch is always merged into the clk-next branch of clk.git
> and usually it is fully merged into Linus' tree before the next release.
> I accumulate clk framework and driver fixes on this branch and send code
> from here after the merge window closes.
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git#clk-fixes

Added from Tuesday.

Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next.  As
you may know, this is not a judgement of your code.  The purpose of
linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of
conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window. 

You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have
been:
     * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
        Signed-off-by,
     * posted to the relevant mailing list,
     * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
     * successfully unit tested, and 
     * destined for the current or next Linux merge window.

Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
to fetch).  It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell 
sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped