linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 19/30] selftests: ntsync: Add some tests for NTSYNC_IOC_WAIT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240329000621.148791-20-zfigura@codeweavers.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 19:06:10 -0500
From: Elizabeth Figura <zfigura@...eweavers.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	wine-devel@...ehq.org,
	André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
	Arkadiusz Hiler <ahiler@...eweavers.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Elizabeth Figura <zfigura@...eweavers.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 19/30] selftests: ntsync: Add some tests for NTSYNC_IOC_WAIT_ANY.

Test basic synchronous functionality of NTSYNC_IOC_WAIT_ANY, when objects are
considered signaled or not signaled, and how they are affected by a successful
wait.

Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Figura <zfigura@...eweavers.com>
---
 .../testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c | 119 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 119 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c
index 7cd0f40594fd..40ad8cbd3138 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c
@@ -342,4 +342,123 @@ TEST(mutex_state)
 	close(fd);
 }
 
+TEST(test_wait_any)
+{
+	int objs[NTSYNC_MAX_WAIT_COUNT + 1], fd, ret;
+	struct ntsync_mutex_args mutex_args = {0};
+	struct ntsync_sem_args sem_args = {0};
+	__u32 owner, index, count, i;
+	struct timespec timeout;
+
+	clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &timeout);
+
+	fd = open("/dev/ntsync", O_CLOEXEC | O_RDONLY);
+	ASSERT_LE(0, fd);
+
+	sem_args.count = 2;
+	sem_args.max = 3;
+	sem_args.sem = 0xdeadbeef;
+	ret = ioctl(fd, NTSYNC_IOC_CREATE_SEM, &sem_args);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+	EXPECT_NE(0xdeadbeef, sem_args.sem);
+
+	mutex_args.owner = 0;
+	mutex_args.count = 0;
+	mutex_args.mutex = 0xdeadbeef;
+	ret = ioctl(fd, NTSYNC_IOC_CREATE_MUTEX, &mutex_args);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+	EXPECT_NE(0xdeadbeef, mutex_args.mutex);
+
+	objs[0] = sem_args.sem;
+	objs[1] = mutex_args.mutex;
+
+	ret = wait_any(fd, 2, objs, 123, &index);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, index);
+	check_sem_state(sem_args.sem, 1, 3);
+	check_mutex_state(mutex_args.mutex, 0, 0);
+
+	ret = wait_any(fd, 2, objs, 123, &index);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, index);
+	check_sem_state(sem_args.sem, 0, 3);
+	check_mutex_state(mutex_args.mutex, 0, 0);
+
+	ret = wait_any(fd, 2, objs, 123, &index);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+	EXPECT_EQ(1, index);
+	check_sem_state(sem_args.sem, 0, 3);
+	check_mutex_state(mutex_args.mutex, 1, 123);
+
+	count = 1;
+	ret = post_sem(sem_args.sem, &count);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, count);
+
+	ret = wait_any(fd, 2, objs, 123, &index);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, index);
+	check_sem_state(sem_args.sem, 0, 3);
+	check_mutex_state(mutex_args.mutex, 1, 123);
+
+	ret = wait_any(fd, 2, objs, 123, &index);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+	EXPECT_EQ(1, index);
+	check_sem_state(sem_args.sem, 0, 3);
+	check_mutex_state(mutex_args.mutex, 2, 123);
+
+	ret = wait_any(fd, 2, objs, 456, &index);
+	EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret);
+	EXPECT_EQ(ETIMEDOUT, errno);
+
+	owner = 123;
+	ret = ioctl(mutex_args.mutex, NTSYNC_IOC_MUTEX_KILL, &owner);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+
+	ret = wait_any(fd, 2, objs, 456, &index);
+	EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret);
+	EXPECT_EQ(EOWNERDEAD, errno);
+	EXPECT_EQ(1, index);
+
+	ret = wait_any(fd, 2, objs, 456, &index);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+	EXPECT_EQ(1, index);
+
+	/* test waiting on the same object twice */
+	count = 2;
+	ret = post_sem(sem_args.sem, &count);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, count);
+
+	objs[0] = objs[1] = sem_args.sem;
+	ret = wait_any(fd, 2, objs, 456, &index);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, index);
+	check_sem_state(sem_args.sem, 1, 3);
+
+	ret = wait_any(fd, 0, NULL, 456, &index);
+	EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret);
+	EXPECT_EQ(ETIMEDOUT, errno);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < NTSYNC_MAX_WAIT_COUNT + 1; ++i)
+		objs[i] = sem_args.sem;
+
+	ret = wait_any(fd, NTSYNC_MAX_WAIT_COUNT, objs, 123, &index);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, index);
+
+	ret = wait_any(fd, NTSYNC_MAX_WAIT_COUNT + 1, objs, 123, &index);
+	EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret);
+	EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
+
+	ret = wait_any(fd, -1, objs, 123, &index);
+	EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret);
+	EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
+
+	close(sem_args.sem);
+	close(mutex_args.mutex);
+
+	close(fd);
+}
+
 TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
-- 
2.43.0