[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240329103544.545290-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 11:35:40 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Karel Balej <balejk@...fyz.cz>
Cc: regressions@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] pwm: Fix setting period with #pwm-cells = <1> and of_pwm_single_xlate()
For drivers making use of of_pwm_single_xlate() (i.e. those that don't
pass a hwpwm index) and also don't pass flags, setting period was
wrongly skipped. This affects the pwm-pxa and ti-sn65dsi86 drivers.
Reported-by: Karel Balej <balejk@...fyz.cz>
Fixes: 40ade0c2e794 ("pwm: Let the of_xlate callbacks accept references without period")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
---
drivers/pwm/core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c
index 54a62879fffa..ee3ef3f44bc5 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c
@@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ of_pwm_single_xlate(struct pwm_chip *chip, const struct of_phandle_args *args)
if (IS_ERR(pwm))
return pwm;
- if (args->args_count > 1)
+ if (args->args_count > 0)
pwm->args.period = args->args[0];
pwm->args.polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists