linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Add SM8475 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b1233669-275d-4108-b598-db0ca7154056@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 12:23:03 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: Danila Tikhonov <danila@...xyga.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
 kishon@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
 conor+dt@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Add SM8475 support

On 28.03.2024 8:45 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 27-03-24, 22:38, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 27.03.2024 7:06 PM, Danila Tikhonov wrote:
>>> Add the tables and constants for init sequences for UFS QMP phy found in
>>> SM8475 SoC.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Danila Tikhonov <danila@...xyga.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> Worth mentioning that SM8475 is a respin of SM8450 on a different
>> process node, which probably forced some electrical changes.
> 
> should the tables be resued from 8450 instead of 8550 as in this patch?

No, and the reason why is my message above

Konrad