[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZgazhqoK2Icgahy9@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 12:26:46 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: York Jasper Niebuhr <yjnworkstation@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
willy@...ux.intel.com, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: init_mlocked_on_free_v3
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 12:54:46PM +0100, York Jasper Niebuhr wrote:
> + if (want_init_mlocked_on_free() && folio_test_mlocked(folio)
> + && !delay_rmap && folio_test_anon(folio)) {
> + kernel_init_pages(page, 1);
Confusing indentation. One of these two options:
if (want_init_mlocked_on_free() && folio_test_mlocked(folio) &&
!delay_rmap && folio_test_anon(folio)) {
kernel_init_pages(page, 1);
if (want_init_mlocked_on_free() && folio_test_mlocked(folio) &&
!delay_rmap && folio_test_anon(folio)) {
kernel_init_pages(page, 1);
Also, '1' is incorrect. Should be folio_nr_pages(folio).
> @@ -2559,12 +2570,21 @@ static void __init mem_debugging_and_hardening_init(void)
> }
> #endif
>
> - if ((_init_on_alloc_enabled_early || _init_on_free_enabled_early) &&
> + if ((_init_on_alloc_enabled_early || _init_on_free_enabled_early
> + || _init_mlocked_on_free_enabled_early) &&
> page_poisoning_requested) {
Wrong indentation again. I'm not going to point these out every time,
just fix it throughout.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists