lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <171171565713.8069.1119556185211827014.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 12:34:17 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Louis Chauvet <louis.chauvet@...tlin.com>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, 
 yen-mei.goh@...sight.com, koon-kee.lie@...sight.com, 
 jeremie.dautheribes@...tlin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add multi mode support for omap-mcspi

On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 10:32:10 +0100, Louis Chauvet wrote:
> This series adds the support for the omap-mcspi multi mode which allows
> sending SPI messages with a shorter delay between CS and the message.
> 
> One drawback of the multi-mode is that the CS is raised between each word,
> so it can only be used with messages containing 1 word transfers and
> asking for cs_change. Few devices, like FPGAs, may easily workaround this
> limitation.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/3] spi: spi-omap2-mcspi.c: revert "Toggle CS after each word"
      commit: 67bb37c05a6b56e0e1f804706145a52f655af3f1
[2/3] spi: omap2-mcspi: Add support for MULTI-mode
      commit: d153ff4056cb346fd6182a8a1bea6e12b714b64f
[3/3] spi: omap2-mcpsi: Enable MULTI-mode in more situations
      commit: e64d3b6fc9a388d7dc516668651cf4404bffec9b

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ