linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] spi: more tx_buf/rx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 12:34:21 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] spi: more tx_buf/rx_buf removal

On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:51:44 -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> I found a couple more controller drivers that were checking if the
> tx_buf and rx_buf fields in the spi_transfer structure were set by a
> peripheral driver that I missed in [1]. These checks can be removed
> as well.
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-spi/20240325-spi-remove-is_dma_mapped-v2-1-d08d62b61f1c@baylibre.com/
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/2] spi: au1550: t->{tx,rx}_dma checks
      commit: c2064672f13344586234183e276cc4e0f2cfb70a
[2/2] spi: fsl: remove is_dma_mapped checks
      commit: 64fe73d10323e399b2e8eb5407390bcb302a046c

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark