[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <edd167fb-df0c-4434-8f9f-7c4016b87d83@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 13:19:05 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Andi Shyti
<andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Olivia Mackall <olivia@...enic.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>, Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] amba: store owner from modules with
amba_driver_register()
On 27/03/2024 10:22, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 27/03/2024 05:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 27/03/2024 00:24, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>>> Hi Krzysztof
>>>
>>> On 26/03/2024 20:23, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> Merging
>>>> =======
>>>> All further patches depend on the first amba patch, therefore please ack
>>>> and this should go via one tree.
>>>
>>> Are you able to provide a stable branch with these patches once you pull
>>
>> I doubt I will be merging this. I think amba code goes through Russell.
>>
>>> them in to "one tree" here ? We have changes coming up in the coresight
>>> tree, which would conflict with the changes here (horribly).
>>>
>>
>> You mean conflict with coresight conversion to platform driver? Worst
>
> Yes.
>
>> case it is solveable: just drop .owner.
>
> Or, we could merge the CoreSight changes (as they are really not
> affected by the problem this series is trying to address) after the
> base changes land in AMBA, via the CoreSight tree.
I'll provide you a stable branch to fetch. I was defeated by Russell's
patch tracking system.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists