[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40382494-7253-442b-91a8-e80c38fb4f2c@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 21:41:30 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, jroedel@...e.de,
thomas.lendacky@....com, hpa@...or.com, ardb@...nel.org, seanjc@...gle.com,
vkuznets@...hat.com, jmattson@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, slp@...hat.com, pgonda@...gle.com,
peterz@...radead.org, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com, tobin@....com, bp@...en8.de,
vbabka@...e.cz, kirill@...temov.name, ak@...ux.intel.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com,
alpergun@...gle.com, jarkko@...nel.org, ashish.kalra@....com,
nikunj.dadhania@....com, pankaj.gupta@....com, liam.merwick@...cle.com,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>, Harald Hoyer <harald@...fian.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 12/29] KVM: SEV: Add KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_FINISH command
On 3/29/24 23:58, Michael Roth wrote:
>
> + /* Handle boot vCPU first to ensure consistent measurement of initial state. */
> + if (!boot_vcpu_handled && vcpu->vcpu_id != 0)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (boot_vcpu_handled && vcpu->vcpu_id == 0)
> + continue;
Why was this not necessary for KVM_SEV_LAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSA? Do we need
it now?
> +See SEV-SNP specification [snp-fw-abi]_ for SNP_LAUNCH_FINISH further details
> +on launch finish input parameters.
See SNP_LAUNCH_FINISH in the SEV-SNP specification [snp-fw-abi]_ for
further details on the input parameters in ``struct
kvm_sev_snp_launch_finish``.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists