linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] misc: uacce - add the null check for the input pointer and its pointer members

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024033032-catalyze-clip-cc53@gregkh>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 08:01:58 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: huangchenghai <huangchenghai2@...wei.com>
Cc: zhangfei.gao@...aro.org, wangzhou1@...ilicon.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
	fanghao11@...wei.com, shenyang39@...wei.com, liulongfang@...wei.com,
	qianweili@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: uacce - add the null check for the input pointer
 and its pointer members

On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 11:34:24AM +0800, huangchenghai wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at2:34PM, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 02:26:55PM +0800, Chenghai Huang wrote:
> > > The uacce_alloc() is the member of the EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. Therefore, null
> > > pointer verification is added on the pointer type input parameter and its
> > > pointer members.
> > I do not understand, why does the export type matter?  Just fix any
> > callers to use this properly and send proper parameters.  What in-tree
> > caller needs this?
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> The interface defined by the export type seems important and the input
> parameters need to be verified.

The export type does not matter at all.

> But I understand from your mail that this is the job of the caller.

Exactly.

> By the way, I still have a confusion. Interfaces like ioctrl, debugfs, read,
> or write require parameter validation. so what kind of kernel interfaces require
> parameter validation? Is there a definition?

Some do, some do not, it depends on the situation.  If data comes from
an untrusted source (i.e. outside the kernel), then it MUST be validated
(remember "all input is evil"), but if it's from within the kernel,
usually it does not.

thanks,

greg k-h