[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH5jb=b=SXSRQM0YHb0fz5Rt+k1DMfuVQ-Fj+Sa20XrNM+vwqg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 16:38:45 +0800
From: 鄭以新 <richard120310@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rbtree: Introduce rb_remove()
>> We wouldn't merge a change like this unless there are callers of the
>> new function. Please tell us everything about that.
The last reply didn't follow the requested plain text form, I'm sorry about
that, again thanks for your patience and time on reviewing my patch.
Best Regards,
I Hsin Cheng.
鄭以新 <richard120310@...il.com> 於 2024年3月29日 週五 下午5:10寫道:
>>
>> We wouldn't merge a change like this unless there are callers of the
>> new function. Please tell us everything about that.
>
>
> I see, thanks for your review and the explanation.
>
> Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> 於 2024年3月29日 週五 上午3:36寫道:
>>
>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:45:39 +0800 I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Implement the function "rb_remove()", which can perform the removal of a
>> > certain key from the tree. Once the node with the searched key is found,
>> > we call "rb_erase()" to perform the removal of the node, otherwise the
>> > key doesn't exists in the tree then we return NULL.
>> >
>> > ...
>> >
>>
>> We wouldn't merge a change like this unless there are callers of the
>> new function. Please tell us everything about that.
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists