linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH stable-5.10] mm/memory-failure: fix an incorrect use of tail pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 10:12:31 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable-5.10] mm/memory-failure: fix an incorrect use of
 tail pages

On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 03:57:06AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 11:36:49AM +0800, Liu Shixin wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > After backport commit c79c5a0a00a9 ("mm/memory-failure: check the mapcount of the precise page"),
> > 
> > I got an error message as written on the patch. The problem can be fixed by the patch or just revert.
> > 
> > Now I prefer to revert because I think it is related to folio and no impact in stable, or maybe I'm wrong.
> 
> I checked out what is going wrong here, and Liu Shixin is correct.
> 
> Commit c79c5a0a00a9 was incorrectly backported to v5.10 and
> commit 70168fdc743b changees the page passed to try_to_unmap().
> It now passes the tail page, and should always have passed hpage.
> Please apply the patch below to v5.10 (and any other trees that
> c79c5a0a00a9 got backported to).

All now queued up,t hanks.

greg k-h