[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240331021926.2732572-2-xiongwei.song@windriver.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2024 10:19:23 +0800
From: <xiongwei.song@...driver.com>
To: <vbabka@...e.cz>, <rientjes@...gle.com>, <cl@...ux.com>,
<penberg@...nel.org>, <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
<42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
CC: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] mm/slub: remove the check of !kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial()
From: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@...driver.com>
The check of !kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial(s) with
CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL enabled here is always false. We have known the
result by calling kmem_cacke_debug(). Here we can remove it.
Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@...driver.com>
---
mm/slub.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 1bb2a93cf7b6..059922044a4f 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2610,8 +2610,7 @@ static struct slab *get_partial_node(struct kmem_cache *s,
partial_slabs++;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
- if (!kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial(s)
- || partial_slabs > s->cpu_partial_slabs / 2)
+ if (partial_slabs > s->cpu_partial_slabs / 2)
break;
#else
break;
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists