[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d1da7fdb-10f6-7f69-4820-520469c0193c@bootlin.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2024 10:35:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>
To: Cathy Cai <cathy.cai@...soc.com>
cc: cathycai0714@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xuewen.yan94@...il.com, cixi.geng1@...soc.com, wade.shu@...soc.com,
zhiguo.niu@...soc.com, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, joabreu@...opsys.com,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] net: stmmac: Fix the problem about interrupt storm
Hello Cathy,
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024, Cathy Cai wrote:
> Tx queue time out then reset adapter. When reset the adapter, stmmac driver
> sets the state to STMMAC_DOWN and calls dev_close() function. If an interrupt
> is triggered at this instant after setting state to STMMAC_DOWN, before the
> dev_close() call.
>
..
> - set_bit(STMMAC_DOWN, &priv->state);
> dev_close(priv->dev);
> + set_bit(STMMAC_DOWN, &priv->state);
> dev_open(priv->dev, NULL);
> clear_bit(STMMAC_DOWN, &priv->state);
> clear_bit(STMMAC_RESETING, &priv->state);
If this IRQ issue can happen whenever STMMAC_DOWN is set while the net device is
open, then it could also happen between the dev_open() and
clear_bit(STMMAC_DOWN) calls right? So you'd have to clear STMMAC_DOWN before
calling dev_open() but then I don't see the usefulness of setting STMMAC_DOWN
and clearing it immediately. Maybe closing and opening the net device should be
enough?
Moreover, it seems strange to me that stmmac_interrupt() unconditionnally
ignores interrupts when the driver is in STMMAC_DOWN state. This seems like
dangerous behaviour, since it could cause IRQ storm issues whenever something
in the driver sets this state. I'm not too familiar with the interrupt handling
in this driver, but maybe stmmac_interrupt() could clear interrupts
unconditionnally in the STMMAC_DOWN state?
Best Regards,
--
Romain Gantois, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists