[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240401091057.1044-2-kwangjin.ko@sk.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 18:10:56 +0900
From: Kwangjin Ko <kwangjin.ko@...com>
To: dave@...olabs.net,
jonathan.cameron@...wei.com,
dave.jiang@...el.com,
alison.schofield@...el.com,
vishal.l.verma@...el.com,
ira.weiny@...el.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com
Cc: linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel_team@...ynix.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] cxl/core: Fix incorrect array index in cxl_clear_event_record()
The variable 'i' should be incremented after dev_dbg(), or print
gen->hdr.handle instead. Otherwise, the handle value of the next loop
will be printed. Furthermore, in the final loop, accessing 'handles[i]'
will cause a buffer overflow.
Signed-off-by: Kwangjin Ko <kwangjin.ko@...com>
---
drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
index a38531a055c8..84014aa01c95 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
+++ b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
@@ -913,9 +913,9 @@ static int cxl_clear_event_record(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds,
struct cxl_event_record_raw *raw = &get_pl->records[cnt];
struct cxl_event_generic *gen = &raw->event.generic;
- payload->handles[i++] = gen->hdr.handle;
dev_dbg(mds->cxlds.dev, "Event log '%d': Clearing %u\n", log,
- le16_to_cpu(payload->handles[i]));
+ le16_to_cpu(gen->hdr.handle));
+ payload->handles[i++] = gen->hdr.handle;
if (i == max_handles) {
payload->nr_recs = i;
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists