linux-kernel - Re: regression/bisected/6.9 commit 587d67fd929ad89801bcc429675bda90d53f6592 decrease 30% of gaming performance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABXGCsMmRFW3EYJ3UvNd-LO7ZTOyoNqjc_3OAmaCDSL=LuxJqg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 16:07:26 +0500
From: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@...il.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: regression/bisected/6.9 commit 587d67fd929ad89801bcc429675bda90d53f6592
 decrease 30% of gaming performance

On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 12:07 PM Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote:
>
> Is it a regression against the performance on 6.8?
>
> If so, what happens when you revert both this (587d67fd929a) and
> beb45974dd49?  That should make the timer code back to 6.8 code.
>
>
> Takashi

The commit beb45974dd49 boosted performance to 30%, but commit
587d67fd929a canceled this boost.

I want to say that reverting commit beb45974dd49 returns performance
to 83FPS [1] and this is sad.

So I ask again is it possible to find a better approach than 587d67fd929a?

[1] https://postimg.cc/xJMjkcHP

-- 
Best Regards,
Mike Gavrilov.

Download attachment "6.9.0-rc1-test-rev-587d67fd929a-beb45974dd49.zip" of type "application/zip" (55551 bytes)