[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c5562704-6ebf-4bd3-b0dc-37068a9e472c@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 16:52:32 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64: dts: marvell: cn9130-crb: drop wrong
unit-addresses
On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 04:10:50PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Top-level nodes, not being on MMIO bus, do not have "reg" properties and
> should not have unit addresses. Correct their name as well to match
> "Generic node names" recommendation from Devicetree specification.
> This also fixes dtc W=1 warnings:
>
> cn9130-crb.dtsi:29.35-37.4: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /ap0_mmc_vccq@0: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property
> cn9130-crb.dtsi:39.38-46.4: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /cp0_usb3_vbus@1: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property
> cn9130-crb.dtsi:57.33-65.4: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /cp0_sd_vccq@0: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property
> cn9130-crb.dtsi:67.31-75.4: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /cp0_sd_vcc@0: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists