linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] spi: dt-bindings: add Siflower Quad SPI controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 11:36:08 +0800
From: Qingfang Deng <dqfext@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Qingfang Deng <qingfang.deng@...lower.com.cn>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] spi: dt-bindings: add Siflower Quad SPI controller

Hi Krzysztof,

On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 1:42 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 29/03/2024 02:51, Qingfang Deng wrote:
> > Add YAML devicetree bindings for Siflower Quad SPI controller.
>
> Describe the hardware. What is this Siflower?

It's a new RISC-V SoC which hasn't been upstreamed yet.

> > +properties:
> > +  compatible:
> > +    const: siflower,qspi
>
> Except that this was not tested, aren't you adding it for some SoC? If
> so, then you miss here SoC part.

I should add the "siflower" prefix to
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml, right?

Regards,
Qingfang